FEATURES OF SPATIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TERRITORIES OF THE VOLGO-KAMSK MACROREGION

Main Article Content

Людмила Егоровна Красильникова Дмитрий Аркадьевич Баландин Светлана Сергеевна Федосеева

Abstract

The article examines the problems of the spatial and sectoral organization of rural areas. The purpose of the article is to consider the sectoral structure, determine the content and identify trends in the spatial and sectoral development of rural areas of the subjects of the Volga-Kama macro-region of the Russian Federation. The study used the methodology of structural analysis to carry out analytical studies of the sectoral potential of rural areas and their resource potential in the space of the macroregion and its constituent entities, as well as elements of a strategic approach. In the course of the study, scientific sources devoted to the problems of reproduction processes in rural areas of a number of countries were studied. The structural analysis of the main production indicators characterizing the spatial development of rural areas is carried out on the example of the subjects of the Volga-Kama macroregion. The leading position of the Republic of Tatarstan in the sample for the absolute majority of the considered indicators has been established, which confirms the effectiveness of government bodies, the consistency and continuity of the processes of systemic regulation of agricultural production in the region. Systemic shortcomings in the activities of the management of the agro-industrial complex of the Perm Territory, as well as the orientation of the management of most regions to support industries, rather than development, are stated. It is proposed to develop the spatial and sectoral organization of rural areas through the introduction of innovative forms of management, involving the coordination of sectoral and infrastructural development in the implementation of priority areas and local advantages. The conclusion is formulated that in order to overcome the existing problems, it is necessary to improve the processes of inter-level, inter-sectoral and inter-territorial interaction as a result of state policy and market regulation of reproduction processes in the space of rural areas on the basis of mechanisms for coordinating key interests.

Article Details

Section
Статьи

References

1. Albekov KH.N., Kokov N.S. Investitsionno-stabilizatsionnaya sistema situatsionnogo upravleniya razvitiem sel'skikh territorii // Vestnik Akademii znanii. 2020. № 4 (39). S. 30-33.
2. Anichin V.L., Khudobin A.I. Otsenka ehffektivnosti razvitiya regional'nogo ehkonomicheskogo prostranstva // Innovatsii v APK: problemy i perspektivy. 2020. № 3 (27). S. 135-141.
3. Antipin I.A., Vlasova N.YU., Ivanova O.YU. Strategicheskie prioritety upravleniya prostranstvennymi disproportsiyami sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Rossii // Upravlenets. 2020. T. 11. № 6. S. 28-43.
4. Bondarenko L.V., Yakovleva O.A. Differentsiatsiya sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii po urovnyu razvitiya sel'skikh territorii i antidepressivnoe upravlenie // Innovatsii v APK: problemy i perspektivy. 2017. № 2 (14). S. 31-38.
5. Butakova M.M., Sokolova O.N. Mezhregional'noe ehkonomicheskoe vzaimodeistvie: sistemnyi podkhod // Ehkonomika. Biznes. Banki. 2018. № 2 (23). S. 10-21.
6. Bukhtiyarova T.I., Dem'yanov D.G. Novaya model' upravleniya v ehkonomicheskom prostranstve sel'skikh territorii: teoriya i metodologiya issledovaniya // Sotsium i vlast'. 2019. № 6 (80). S. 87-98.
7. Vyzovy i politika prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii v XXI veke / Red. V.M. Kotlyakov, A.N. Shvetsov, O.B. Glezer. Moskva: Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK, 2020. 365 s.
8. Dvoryadkina E.B., Kaibicheva E.I., Goncharova N.I. Upravlenie prostranstvennym razvitiem regiona: opyt, nasledie i zadachi na budushchee // Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: ehkonomika. 2017. № 4. S. 60-67.
9. Zakshevskii V.G., Merenkova I.N., Novikova I.I., Kusmagambetova E.S. Metodicheskii instrumentarii diagnostiki diversifikatsii sel'skoi ehkonomiki // Ehkonomika regiona. 2019. T. 15. Vyp. 2. S. 520-533.
10. Krasil'nikova L. E. Upravlenie agropromyshlennymi territorial'no-ehkonomicheskimi sistemami: teoriya, metodologiya i praktika. Perm': Prokrost", 2019. 368 s.
11. Lavrikova YU.G., Suvorova A.V. Optimal'naya prostranstvennaya organizatsiya ehkonomiki regiona: poisk parametrov i zavisimostei // Ehkonomika regiona. 2020. T. 16. № 4. S. 1017-1030.
12. Mantino F. Sel'skoe razvitie v Evrope. Politika, instituty i deistvuyushchie litsa na mestakh s 1970-kh godov do nashikh dnei: per. s ital. Rim: Business Media, 2010. 272 s.
13. Minakir P.A., Dzhurka N.G. Metodologicheskie osnovaniya prostranstvennykh issledovanii v ehkonomike // Vestnik RAN. 2018. T. 88. № 7. S. 589-598.
14. Nabieva A.R. Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskaya znachimost' kolichestvennogo i kachestvennogo razvitiya sel'skikh territorii // Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020. T. 15. № 3 (59). S. 126-132.
15. Petrikov A.V. Politika sel'skogo razvitiya v Rossii: napravleniya i mekhanizmy // Nikonovskie chteniya. 2019. № 24. S. 1-10.
16. Semin A.N., Bukhtiyarova T.I., Nemykina YU.S. Organizatsionno-ehkonomicheskii potentsial sel'skikh territorii: indikativnyi podkhod k upravleniyu // Agrarnyi vestnik Urala. 2019. № 9 (188). S. 91-98.
17. Silin YA.P., Animitsa E.G. Ehvolyutsiya paradigmy regional'noi ehkonomiki // Journal of New Economy. 2020. T. 21. № 1. S. 5-28.
18. Tarasov A.N., Tarasov A.S., Antonova N.I., Podgorskaya S.V., Bakhmatova G.A., Markina E.D. Instituty i modeli v sisteme upravleniya kompleksnym razvitiem sel'skikh territorii. Rostov-na-Donu, 2020.
19. Uskova T.V. Ustoichivost' razvitiya territorii i sovremennye metody upravleniya // Problemy razvitiya territorii. 2020. № 2 (106). S. 7-18.
20. Sheresheva M.YU., Oborin M.S., Shimuk O.V. Analiz mezhdunarodnogo opyta diversifikatsii sel'skoi ehkonomiki // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. T. 19. № 3. S. 209-223.