DETERMINING THE DEGREE OF FINANCIAL RELIABILITY OF A CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article studies the degree of financial reliability of a construction organization using the example of Gefest LLC. In the modern field of income and expense management, an integral part of which is the granularity of data and its relevance, it is necessary to take into account both internal and external environmental factors. The use of strategic analysis in the field of financial and economic activities allows you to plan areas for improving results. An important component of the development of an income and expense management system is to increase the detail of data and compile a complete image of financial and economic activities for the development of company development programs.
A methodology has been identified for analyzing the income and expenses of organizations, with the help of which one can find out the possibilities for optimizing the scale of the financial reliability of a construction organization, namely, income and expenses, both in general and for individual types of activities. It allows you to analyze how profitable the enterprise is and what the profit is, that is, this analysis technique assesses the financial condition of the enterprise and makes it possible to consider its improvements.
Gefest LLC is a relatively young company in the construction market of the Penza region, which is engaged in the construction of cottages, houses, non-residential premises, as well as the organization of ponds and reservoirs. Since 2023, the construction of highways has become a new area of activity. This direction allowed to improve the company's financial performance.
Article Details
References
2. Malyshev A.A., Solodkov N.N., Korobkova N.A. Formation of a management model for green production // Theoretical and Applied Ecology. 2022. No. 2. P. 93-100.
3. Nikiforova I.I. The concept and essence of income and expenses of an organization / I.I. Nikiforova // Current issues of economics. - 2019. - No. 12. - P. 102-103.
4. Reznik G.A., Malyshev A.A. Mechanisms of economic motivation of enterprises in conditions of sustainability of the ecological and economic system // Bulletin of the Volga State Technological University. Series: Economics and management. 2012. No. 2 (16). pp. 63-68.
5. Skamai L. G., Trubochkina M. I. Economic analysis of enterprise activity. Textbook. M.: Infra-M, 2020. – pp. 35-36.
6. Khokhlacheva A.N. Ways to grow income and increase enterprise profits in modern conditions // Financial system of the new era: development prospects. Current problems and priority innovative directions for the development of modern science. – 2019. – pp. 58-60.
7. Boumans, R., R. Costanza, J. Farley, M. A. Wilson, R. Portela, J. Rotmans, F. Villa, and M. Grasso. 2002. Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecological Economics 41:529- 560
8. Costanza, R. (ed.) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. new York: Columbia university Press, 1991. p.32-46
9. Crivelenti R. C., Bueno C. R. P., J. S. R. Pires, L. Francisco, B. F. Lessi Ecological-Economic zoning of the city of Antopolis – SP, Bsazil / Journal of the Brazilian Association of Agricultural Engineering. Engenharia Agrícola vol. 36n. 06 doi: doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v36n6p1218-1228/2016
10. Daily, G. C. et al. 2009 Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver. Front. Ecol. Environ.
11. Daly, H.E. (1991). Elements of environmental macroeconomics. In Costanza, R. (ed.) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, p.32-46
12. de Groot, R. S., M. A. Wilson, et al. (2002). "A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services." Ecological Economics 41(3): 393-408
13. Gao, Q., Mao, H., 2003. GIS-based study on the ecological and economic regionalization of Yun-yang County in the Three Gorges reservoir area. Acta Ecologica Sinica 23 (1), 74–81.
14. Jackson, T 2009. Prosperity without Growth – economics for a finite planet. London: Routledge
15. Røpke, I. (2016). Complementary system perspectives in ecological macroeconomics — The example of transition investments during the crisis. Ecological Economics, forthcoming. Universe Press, Washington DC, USA.