ORGANIZATIONAL, ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE RESTORATION OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS DAMAGED DURING MILITARY ACTIONS: KEY FACTORS OF LAND DEGRADATION, THE EXPERIENCE OF THE USSR, PROBLEMS OF INFORMATION AND LEGAL SUPPORT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the main factors of land violations in the conditions of warfare on the example of the DPR and LPR, as well as the experience of the USSR in the rehabilitation of lands violated during the war (on the example of Belarus). Based on this experience, problematic issues have been identified, including a significant reduction or even cessation of agricultural production in the relevant territory, a shortage of labor, a shortage of land managers, land reclamation and other qualified personnel necessary to carry out work on the rehabilitation of disturbed lands. In addition, attention is paid to the specifics of collecting information about violated lands in the conditions of ongoing hostilities and the specifics of harmonizing local land legislation with federal legislation: the absence of local land legislation similar to Russian regions, valid until 2026. transition period. Given the ongoing hostilities and the presence of a large number of explosive objects, it is safer to conduct surveys within the surveyed territories using unmanned aircraft. At the same time, the contribution of the State University of Land Management to the restoration of agricultural production and rehabilitation of disturbed lands after the Great Patriotic War was also noted and developments that can be applied during surveys of disturbed lands, in particular the AgroQuadro and Quadrovision projects, were considered. It is concluded that when carrying out work on the restoration of agricultural lands violated during military operations, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of the territories where they are carried out; Moreover, this applies both to the state of the lands (natural, climatic and economic factors, the disturbance of these lands during hostilities) and the difficult situation in local legislation
Article Details
References
2. Volkov S.N. i dr. (2022) Zemleustroitel'noe obespechenie vovlecheniya v oborot neispol'zuemyh zemel' sel'skohozyajstvennogo naznacheniya. [Land management support for the involvement of unused agricultural land in circulation]. Mezhdunarodnyj sel'skohozyajstvennyj zhurnal. [International Agricultural Journal]. No. 3 (387). pp. 220-225.
3. Vosstanovlenie sel'skogo hozyajstva Belarusi 1946—1950: Dokumenty i materialy. (2023). Sost. V.D,Selemenev, V.V. Kondrashin, I.A.Vishnevskij i dr. [Restoration of agriculture in Belarus 1946-1950: Documents and materials]. Minsk.: Nacional'nyj arhiv Respubliki Belarus'. [National Archive of the Republic of Belarus]. 923 p.
4. Drozd, G. YA. (2023). Ocenka degradacii kachestva okruzhayushchej sredy Donbassa vsledstvie godovyh boevyh dejstvij. [Assessment of the degradation of the environmental quality of Donbass as a result of annual hostilities]. Agrotekhnika i energoobespechenie. [ Agrotechnics and energy supply]. № 2(39). Pp. 90-100.
5. Drozd G.YA., Hvortova M.YU. (2014). Ekocid i ego posledstviya na Donbasse. [Ecocide and its consequences in Donbas]. Agrotekhnika i energoobespechenie. [Agrotechnics and energy suply]. No. 4 (4) pp. 73-91.
6. Doronin A.P., SHestopalov A.V., Kanarskij I.D. (2002). Ekologicheskie problemy vooruzhennoj bor'by. [Environmental problems of armed struggle]. Voennaya mysl'. [Military thought]. №3.
7. Kovalenko, V. S., Artem'ev V. B., Opanasenko P. I. (2013). Zemlesberegayushchie i zemlevosproizvodyashchie tekhnologii na ugol'nyh razrezah [ Earth–saving and earth-reproducing technologies at coal mines]. Moscow. Izd-vo «Gornoe delo» [Publishing house "Mining"]. 440 p.
8. Kovalenko, V. S., SHtejncajg R. M., Golik T. V. (2012). Rekul'tivaciya narushennyh zemel' na kar'erah. [Recultivation of disturbed lands in quarries]. Moscow. Izd-vo «Gornaya Kniga. [Publishing house "Mining Book"]. 65 p.
9. Planirovanie i proektirovanie agrolesomeliorativnyh meropriyatij v zemleustroitel'noj dokumentacii. (2024). [Planning and design of agroforestry measures in land management documentation]. S. N. Volkov, T. V. Papaskiri, E. V. CHerkashina [et al.]. Moscow. Gosudarstvennyj universitet po zemleustrojstvu,. [State University of Land Management]. 320 p.
10. Rekul'tivaciya zemel' i meropriyatiya po vosstanovleniyu narushennyh landshaftov. (2024). [Land reclamation and measures to restore disturbed landscapes]. Papaskiri T. V., Volkov S. N., Ginzburg M. E. [et al.]. Moscow. Gosudarstvennyj universitet po zemleustrojstvu. [State University of Land Management]. 184 p.
11. Savchenko, O. YU., Kurgan E. G. (2017). Napravleniya razvitiya sistemy gosudarstvennogo strategicheskogo planirovaniya v agropromyshlennom komplekse Doneckoj Narodnoj Respubliki. [Directions of development of the state strategic planning system in the agro-industrial complex of the Donetsk People's Republic]. Aktual'nye social'no-ekonomicheskie aspekty upravleniya: gosudarstvo, region, predpriyatie. [Actual socio-economic aspects of management: state, region, enterprise]. Monograp h. St. Petersburg. Svoe izdatel'stvo. [Svoje publishing House]. pp. 87-96.
12. Sharno O.I. (2020). Minimizaciya vreda, prichinennogo zemel'nym resursam: opyt Velikoj otechestvennoj vojny. [Minimization of harm caused to land resources: the experience of the Great Patriotic War]. Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo. [Agrarian and land law]. No. 10(190), pp. 166-169.
13. Papaskiri T.V. Lipski, S.A.(2023) Maintaining the register of agricultural lands as a real step towards the implementation of the data management function for these lands by the state. E3S Web of Conferences. 395. 04003. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202339504003.