PRODUCTIVE AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND ITS USE

Main Article Content

В. В. Алакоз

Abstract

Different plots of land differ greatly from each other in the income they bring to those who use them. Some lands are fertile, others are not, some are close, others are far from the market for the products produced on them, some lands are located near waterways and civilization centers - large cities, and others are so remote that they can provide only a meager living for users. Society creates additional value for land by investing in the construction of roads and railways, schools, other social facilities, as well as due to the fact of the presence of people.
All these advantages and disadvantages can be taken into account with the help of land rent, and this rent, established under the influence of market relations, becomes a true measure of the benefit of owning a particular plot of land.
If the landowner pays the cost of annual rent to the state, then different rent amounts for different plots of land create equal conditions for everyone. By paying land rent to the state (an economic measure of the superiority of a given land plot in relation to others), the landowner thus pays for the state's public expenditures that made this land valuable (roads and railways, social and engineering infrastructure).
This article discusses methods for calculating land rent and its use in establishing land tax, rent, cadastral and market value of agricultural land, and the amount of per-hectare state support for crop production on lands with negative land rent.

Article Details

Section
Agricultural economics and policies

References

1. Sel'skoe khozyaistvo v Rossii. 2023. Statisticheskii sbornik Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki (Rosstat) Moskva 2023.
2. Loiko P.F. Zemlepol'zovanie. Rossiya, mir (vzglyad v budushchee) Kniga pervaya (P.F.Loiko, Gosudarstvennyi universitet po zemleustroistvu – M., 2009 – 332 s.
3. Doklad FAO OON «Polozhenie del v oblasti prodovol'stviya i sel'skogo khozyaistvA» Rim, 2012 g.
4. «Metodicheskie ukazaniya po provedeniyu kompleksnogo monitoringa plodorodiya pochv zemel' sel'skokhozyaistvennogo naznacheniYA», odobrennye Nauchno-tekhnicheskim sovetom Minsel'khoza Rossii 09.04.2003 g. (protokol № 8) i utverzhdeny Prezidentom Rossiiskoi akademii sel'skokhozyaistvennykh nauk G.A. Romanenko 17.09.2003 g., Ministrom sel'skogo khozyaistva Rossiiskoi Federatsii A.V. Gordeevym 24.09.2003 g.
5. Posevnye ploshchadi Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Rosstat. Glavnyi mezhregional'nyi tsentr. Moskva. 2024 god.
6. Bukhgalterskii balans na 31 dekabrya 2022 goda. Minsel'khoz RF. Sel'skoe khozyaistvo. Otchet o finansovykh rezul'tatakh. Otchet o proizvodstve, zatratakh, sebestoimosti i realizatsii produktsii rastenievodstva. Otchet o finansovo-ehkonomicheskom sostoyanii tovaroproizvoditelei agropromyshlennogo kompleksa, sel'skokhozyaistvennykh tovaroproizvoditelei, poluchatelei sredstv, proizvoditelei zernovykh kul'tur za 2022 god. Belgorodskaya oblast' (SKH), Penzenskaya oblast', Kostromskaya oblast'.
7. Adam Smit (1723-1790) «Issledovaniya o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodoV» /Shedevry mirovoi ehkonomicheskoi mysli. Petrokommerts, 1993 g., 320 s.
8. Al'fred Marshall (1842-1924) «Printsipy ehkonomicheskoi naukI» Kniga 6. Glava IX «Zemel'naya rentA». Moskva. Izdatel'skaya gruppa «ProgresS» - 1993 g. 415 s. ISBN-5-01-004-200-2.
9. https://torgi.gov.ru/new/public/lots/reg
10. Shumpeter Iozef Aloiz (1883-1950 gg.). Angliiskii ehkonomist. «Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiYA» 1911, 1926, 1934, 1937 gg. – S. 61, 67, 69.