A BALANCED APPROACH IN MANAGING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE REGIONS OF RUSSIA
Article Sidebar
Published
Dec 9, 2021
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article highlights the conceptual and methodological problems of sustainable development of Russian regions. The relevance of the study is due to the need to solve the main social and environmental problems in the framework of the economic development of the regions. The solution of the main socio-economic problems is impossible without the solution of the most important environmental problems. At the same time, the problems are closely related to each other and require systemic nonlinear solutions. Historical information on the formation of the modern concept of sustainable development is presented. Based on a comparison of data on the ecological footprint and the human capital development index, the article presents the position of Russian regions in relation to the zone of minimum values of sustainable development. The features of the geography of exploitation and export of natural resources in terms of carbon dioxide emissions are presented. The main directions of the implementation of regional policy on the basis of a balance approach to socio-ecological-economic systems are shown.
Article Details
Section
Agricultural economics and policies
References
1. Doklad o Tselyakh v oblasti ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2020 god. OON [Ehlektronnyi resurs] — Rezhim dostupa : www. URL: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2020_Russian.pdf
2. Nikolaichuk O. A. Marks i problemy ehkologii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ehkonomika. – M : Infra-M , 2017 – 5(2) – S. 4-9
3. Svodnoe ezhegodnoe soobshchenie o sostoyanii i izmenenii klimata na territoriyakh gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG za 2019 god. — M. : Rosgidromet, 2020. — 65 s.
4. Strategiya sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii s nizkim urovnem vybrosov parnikovykh gazov do 2050 goda [Ehlektronnyi resurs] : Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF // Konsul'tant Plyus : sprav. Pravovaya sistema. — M., 2021— . — Rezhim dostupa : http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_399657/.
5. Okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2020: Stat. sb./ Rosstat. — M. : 2020. – 113 s.
6. Ehkologicheskii sled sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii – 2019 / nauch. Red. P. A. Boev, D. L. Burenko. — Vsemirnyi fond dikoi prirody (WWF). —M.: WWF Rossii, 2019. — 112 s.
7. AghaKouchak, A., L. Cheng, O. Mazdiyasni, and A. Farahmand, 2014: Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(24), 8847– 8852, doi:10.1002/2014gl062308.
8. Alkire, S., C. Jindra, G. Robles Aguilar, S. Seth, and A. Vaz, 2015: Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2015. Briefing 31, Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, 8 pp.
9. Allen, M.R. and T.F. Stocker, 2013: Impact of delay in reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(1), 23–26, DOI:10.1038/nclimate2077
10. Allen, M.R. et al., 2016: New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nature Climate Change, 6, 1–5, doi:10.1038/nclimate2998
11. Boev P. A., Burenko P. A., 2019 “Ecological footprint of regions of constituent entities of the Russian Federation” / P. A. Boev, P. A. Burenko. WWF Russia Moskow, 2019, 112 p.
12. Chevuturi, A., N.P. Klingaman, A.G. Turner, and S. Hannah, 2018: Projected Changes in the Asian-Australian Monsoon Region in 1.5°C and 2.0°C Global-Warming Scenarios. Earth’s Future, 6(3), 339–358, DOI:10.1002/2017ef000734
13. Ecological Footprint per person: National Footprint Accounts 2018 Edition, Global Footprint Network Human Development Index Human Development Report, UNDP 2016
14. Ecology and economics: dynamics of air pollution in the country on the eve of the ratification of the Paris Agreement / Bulletin on current trends in the Russian economy. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 2019, 24 p.
15. Environmental protection of Russia 2020. Statistic compilation. Rosstat. Moskow, 2021 – 113 p.
16. IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Ptsrtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pian, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Water] NY, 2019, 616 p.
17. Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner Global (eds.), 2018 Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty IPCC, 2018, 60 pp.
18. Meleshko V. P., Govorkova V. A., Kattsov V. M., Malevskii-Malevich S. P., Nadezhina E. D., Sporyshev P. V., Golisyn G. S. Demchenko P. F., Eliseev A. V., Mokhov I. I., Semenov V. A., Khon V. C. “Antropopogenic climate change in Russia in the twenty-first century: an ensemble of climate model projections” Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 22-30
19. Michael E. Mann, 1999 “A study of ocean-atmosphere interaction and low-frequency variability of the climate system” / M. E. Mann. Yale University, Massachusetts, 1999, 148 p.
20. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. N.Y.: United Nations, 2015. 75 p.
21. Olsson, L. et al., 2014: Livelihoods and poverty. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 798–832.
22. Raworth K., 2012: A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Paper. United Kingdom, Oxford, 26 p.
23. Raworth, K., 2017: A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(2), e48–e49, doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30028-1.
24. Rosenbloom, D., 2017: Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 43, 37–50, DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.011.
25. Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., Nijkamp, P. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 119, 2015, pp. 314–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.
26. Schewe, J. et al., 2014: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245– 3250, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1222460110
27. Stahel, W.R., 2016: The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438, DOI:10.1038/531435a
28. Taylor, L.L. et al., 2016: Enhanced weathering strategies for stabilizing climate and averting ocean acidification. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 402–406, doi:10.1038/nclimate2882.
2. Nikolaichuk O. A. Marks i problemy ehkologii // Nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki. Ehkonomika. – M : Infra-M , 2017 – 5(2) – S. 4-9
3. Svodnoe ezhegodnoe soobshchenie o sostoyanii i izmenenii klimata na territoriyakh gosudarstv-uchastnikov SNG za 2019 god. — M. : Rosgidromet, 2020. — 65 s.
4. Strategiya sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii s nizkim urovnem vybrosov parnikovykh gazov do 2050 goda [Ehlektronnyi resurs] : Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF // Konsul'tant Plyus : sprav. Pravovaya sistema. — M., 2021— . — Rezhim dostupa : http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_399657/.
5. Okhrana okruzhayushchei sredy Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2020: Stat. sb./ Rosstat. — M. : 2020. – 113 s.
6. Ehkologicheskii sled sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii – 2019 / nauch. Red. P. A. Boev, D. L. Burenko. — Vsemirnyi fond dikoi prirody (WWF). —M.: WWF Rossii, 2019. — 112 s.
7. AghaKouchak, A., L. Cheng, O. Mazdiyasni, and A. Farahmand, 2014: Global warming and changes in risk of concurrent climate extremes: Insights from the 2014 California drought. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(24), 8847– 8852, doi:10.1002/2014gl062308.
8. Alkire, S., C. Jindra, G. Robles Aguilar, S. Seth, and A. Vaz, 2015: Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2015. Briefing 31, Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK, 8 pp.
9. Allen, M.R. and T.F. Stocker, 2013: Impact of delay in reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Nature Climate Change, 4(1), 23–26, DOI:10.1038/nclimate2077
10. Allen, M.R. et al., 2016: New use of global warming potentials to compare cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants. Nature Climate Change, 6, 1–5, doi:10.1038/nclimate2998
11. Boev P. A., Burenko P. A., 2019 “Ecological footprint of regions of constituent entities of the Russian Federation” / P. A. Boev, P. A. Burenko. WWF Russia Moskow, 2019, 112 p.
12. Chevuturi, A., N.P. Klingaman, A.G. Turner, and S. Hannah, 2018: Projected Changes in the Asian-Australian Monsoon Region in 1.5°C and 2.0°C Global-Warming Scenarios. Earth’s Future, 6(3), 339–358, DOI:10.1002/2017ef000734
13. Ecological Footprint per person: National Footprint Accounts 2018 Edition, Global Footprint Network Human Development Index Human Development Report, UNDP 2016
14. Ecology and economics: dynamics of air pollution in the country on the eve of the ratification of the Paris Agreement / Bulletin on current trends in the Russian economy. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 2019, 24 p.
15. Environmental protection of Russia 2020. Statistic compilation. Rosstat. Moskow, 2021 – 113 p.
16. IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Ptsrtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pian, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Water] NY, 2019, 616 p.
17. Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner Global (eds.), 2018 Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty IPCC, 2018, 60 pp.
18. Meleshko V. P., Govorkova V. A., Kattsov V. M., Malevskii-Malevich S. P., Nadezhina E. D., Sporyshev P. V., Golisyn G. S. Demchenko P. F., Eliseev A. V., Mokhov I. I., Semenov V. A., Khon V. C. “Antropopogenic climate change in Russia in the twenty-first century: an ensemble of climate model projections” Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2004, vol. 4, pp. 22-30
19. Michael E. Mann, 1999 “A study of ocean-atmosphere interaction and low-frequency variability of the climate system” / M. E. Mann. Yale University, Massachusetts, 1999, 148 p.
20. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. N.Y.: United Nations, 2015. 75 p.
21. Olsson, L. et al., 2014: Livelihoods and poverty. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 798–832.
22. Raworth K., 2012: A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live Within the Doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Paper. United Kingdom, Oxford, 26 p.
23. Raworth, K., 2017: A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(2), e48–e49, doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30028-1.
24. Rosenbloom, D., 2017: Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions. Global Environmental Change, 43, 37–50, DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.011.
25. Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., Nijkamp, P. A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics 119, 2015, pp. 314–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.
26. Schewe, J. et al., 2014: Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3245– 3250, DOI:10.1073/pnas.1222460110
27. Stahel, W.R., 2016: The circular economy. Nature, 531(7595), 435–438, DOI:10.1038/531435a
28. Taylor, L.L. et al., 2016: Enhanced weathering strategies for stabilizing climate and averting ocean acidification. Nature Climate Change, 6(4), 402–406, doi:10.1038/nclimate2882.