EFFICIENCY OF REGIONAL LAND USE (ON THE EXAMPLE OF SVERDLOVSK AND TYUMEN REGION)

Main Article Content

Надежда Викторовна Вашукевич Ирина Анатольевна Старицына Юрий Леонидович Байкин Галина Владимировна Вяткина

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the regional efficiency of the use of land resources (on the example of the Sverdlovsk and Tyumen regions) on the basis of integral assessment indicators by land categories. The methodological approach proposed by G.V. Vyazov. For comparison, data are given for all administrative-territorial entities that are part of the Ural Federal District. Based on the calculations, the Sverdlovsk region showed the best efficiency of use by categories of agricultural land and forest land (factor indices X1 and X6), which ensured the maximum values ​​of the resulting indicator return to land (ratio of gross regional product to total land area). In the Tyumen region, the maximum in the Ural Federal District indicator of land profitability was revealed (the ratio of the gross profit of the economy to all land areas), which is a consequence of the region's export orientation and significant incomes of the oil and gas complex. The factor indices X2-X5, which characterize the best return on the categories of industrial lands, lands of settlements and lands of the water fund, have been exceeded relative to the Sverdlovsk region.

Article Details

Section
Agricultural economics and policies

References

1. Nepoklonov V. B., Khabarova I. A., Druchinin S. S. Postroenie mnogofaktornoi modeli ehffektivnogo ispol'zovaniya zemel' Severo-Kavkazskogo ehkonomicheskogo raiona s uchetom ehkologicheskoi sostavlyayushchei // Moskovskii ehkonomicheskii zhurnal. 2017. №1. S. 6-14.
2. Rasskazova A. A., Zhdanova R. V., Khokhlova A.O. Methodology for determining the economic efficiency of sustainable land use management (based on the example of agricultural land use) //International agricultural journal. №1. P. 22-39.
3. Bukhtoyarov N. I., Nedikova E. V., Linkina A. V. Ob otsenke ehkonomicheskoi i ehkologicheskoi ehffektivnosti zemlepol'zovanii // Region: sistemy, ehkonomika, upravlenie. 2017. № 4 (39). S. 129-132.
4. Han H., Zhang X. Static and dynamic cultivated land-use efficiency in China: A minimum distance to strong efficient frontier approach //Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. № 246. P. 119002.
5. Hualin X., Zhang Y., Choi Y. Measuring the Cultivated Land Use Efficiency of the Main Grain-Producing Areas in China under the Constraints of Carbon Emissions and Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution // Sustainability. 2018. № 10 (6).
6. Andrea B., Arzeni A., Bodini A. Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas //Agricultural Systems. 2017. № 151. R.114–125.
7. Tretiak A., Tretiak N., Sklar Y., Lobunko Y., Melnichuk A. Ecological safety of rural areas: ecological and economic assessment of land use efficiency // Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 2020. № 2 (4). R. 539-549.
8. Yao M., Zhang Y. Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China // Sustainability. 2021. № 13. 1771.
9. Zhao X., Zhang L., Huang X., Zhao Y., Zhang Y. Evolution of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Urban Industrial Land Use Efficiency in China //Sustainability. 2018. № 10.
10. Vyazov G.B. Ehffektivnost' ispol'zovaniya zemel'nykh resursov ehkonomiki regiona: metodika otsenki, analiz, tipologiya // Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2014. № 9. S. 19-25
11. Merkulova E.YU., Vyazov G.B. Metodika otsenki ehffektivnosti ispol'zovaniya zemel'nykh resursov regiona // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2015. № 2.