IMPORT SUBSTITUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF HARMONIZATION GEOTOXICOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN LAND USE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Geochemical changes on the planet lead to negative consequences, such as the ingress of toxic substances into the soil or fossils. This makes it necessary to conduct a geotoxicological assessment of the impact of geological processes on the environment.
The article discusses the concept and goals of geotoxicology as the science of the impact of geological processes on the environment. The main options and stages of carrying out are presented, various methods of carrying out geotoxicological assessment are investigated. It is determined that geotoxicological assessment in land use is carried out in four stages: determination of lithological and geochemical features of the composition and properties of sedimentary cover; tracing of technogenic halos and scattering flows from sources of geochemical anomalies to zones of increased toxicity; assessment of the impact of geological, geomorphological and geochemical processes on the technogenic transformation of the habitat; forecast of the dynamics of technogenic disturbances, development of recommendations, organization of geotoxicological monitoring.
It was noted that geotoxicological assessment can be carried out in three different ways, including certain types of work: methods of biogeochemical studies, methods of biotesting, analysis of the conjugacy of technogenic anomalies together with fields containing toxic risk.
Different methods are used at different stages of the geotoxicological assessment. Applying the methods of conducting laboratory experiments, the experimental method is used when conducting a geotoxicological assessment. The problems of implementing the experimental method in practice have led to the fact that the method of actualism (the actualistic method) has spread in geotoxicology. Such a method of conducting a geotoxicological assessment as observation was also considered. After the observation stage and the collection of factual material, generalization methods are applied. The gas survey method is actively used in the study of groundwater pollution. In the future, three main methods are used for geotoxicological assessment of sediments in groundwater: analyses of the entire sediment, tests for the fraction washed with an organic solvent, tests using pore water contained in sediments.
Article Details
References
2. Kravchuk, O.P., Pun'ko V.P., Kadurin V.N., Suchkov I.A. (2017). Metodicheskaya osnova i kontseptual'naya skhema geotoksikologicheskikh issledovanii morskoi sredy [Methodological basis and conceptual scheme of geotoxicological studies of the marine environment]. Geologiya i poleznye iskopaemye Mirovogo okeana, no 1, pp. 65-77.
3. Krupoderov, I.V. (2013) Metodika vyyavleniya i otsenki nefteproduktovogo zagryazneniya geologicheskoi sredy [Methodology of detection and assessment of oil product pollution of the geological environment]. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten' (nauchno-tekhnicheskii zhurnal), no 2, pp.. 384-391.
4. Yakutseni, S.P. (2005) Rasprostranennost' uglevodorodnogo syr'ya, obogashchennogo tyazhelymi ehlementami-primesyami. Otsenka ehkologicheskikh riskov [The prevalence of hydrocarbon raw materials enriched with heavy elements-impurities. Environmental risk assessment]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nedra, 370 p.
5. Adams, W.J., Berry W.J., Burton G.A., Ho K., Macdonald D., Scroggins R., Winger P.V. (2001). Summary of a SETAC Technical Workshop Porewater Toxicity Testing: Biological, Chemical, and Ecological Considerations with a Review of Methods and Applications, and Recommendations for Future Areas of Research. 29 p.
6. Belgis, C.Z., Persoone G., Blaise C. (2003). Cyst-based toxicity tests XVI – sensitivity comparison of the solid phase Heterocypris incongruens microbiotest with the Hyalella azteca and Chironomus riparius contact assays on freshwater sediments from Peninsula Harbour (Ontario, Canada). Chemosphere, 95 р.
7. Hickey, G.L. (2010). Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment: Developments in PNEC Estimation. Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham England, 260 p.
8. Kalinowski, R., Zaleska-Radziwll M. (2011). Ecotoxicological Assessment of Freshwater Sediments. Journal of Environmental Studies., no 20, pp. 1181-1191.
9. Norris, A. I. (1983). Use, Ecotoxicology, and Risk Assessment of Herbicides in the Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Corvallis, pp. 381-393.
10. Olaquer, E. (2016). Atmospheric Impacts of the Oil and Gas Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 170 p.
11. Thomas, K.V., Barnard N., Collins K., Eggleton J. (2003). Toxicity characterisation of sediment porewaters collected from UK estuaries using a Tisbe battagliai bioassay. Chemosphere, no 53, pp. 1005-1011.
12. Viganò, L. (2000). Assessment of the toxicity of River Po sediments with Ceriodaphnia dubia. Aquat. Toxicol, no 47, pp. 191-199.
13. Piet, G.J., Knights A.M., Jongbloed R.H., Tamis J.E., de Vries P., Robinson L.A. (2017). Ecological risk assessments to guide decision-making: Methodology matters. Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 68, pp. 1-9.